Marriage Now In Control Of Supreme Court

We’ll hear from the Supreme Court whether the definition of marriage will exist in a few months. Hearing arguments for same-sex ‘marriage’ this week, will put a decision by the SC sometime in June.

Having emotion trumping rational thought, the ‘left’ is having a field day. Marriage is a privilege—not a right—and is being convoluted into a crime of hate and bigotry to those endorsing same-sex marriage.  Those who want their same-sex union made into a marriage, do not understand what a privilege is, and what a right is.

Some citizens are granted privileges because their abilities offer them the possibility of what others cannot do. Many such privileges exist. One is an airline pilot. Sex is not a deterring factor. But the ability to fly a specific type plane is. That person will not be given that privilege if one has acrophobia, or extreme fear of heights. One is not being discriminated against, if he simply does not have the skill set for flying a Boeing 767 at 30,000 feet. This person will not be allowed to fly.

Privilege Trumps Non-Privilege

If a person has a fear of needles (1 out of every 10 people do), it’s called trypanophobia. That person can’t be a doctor, and probably can’t enter the medical profession. A fear of animals? Zoophobia. A lack of rational thinking makes being a physicist unlikely. Hydrophobia—fear of water? No cruise ship captains. A concert pianist? A big-rig driver? Any large machine operator? A race horse jockey? A race car driver? A particular skill-set enables one the privilege of those job functions. If you don’t have those abilities, you don’t have those privileges.

There’s going to be caveats for most any profession, or specialized job function. Procreation, or baby-making, is a major part of getting married. It’s a particularly specialized job. Many don’t want, or can’t have, babies. Same sex couples know they can’t have children, unless they obtain them some other way. There is no law preventing that, but 41 states now say you have to be married to have children under DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act), and to get special benefits for being married.

Push T o Destroy Marriage As We know It

Gay couples have only been pushing for marriage in the last 10 years. They likely can do a lot of things—they just can’t have kids. It’s time for the ‘left’ to stop the accusations, the name calling, and the hatred.

In actuality, anyone can have sex anytime they want. But a marriage contract is a license for heterosexual married couples to obtain tax advantages, survivor benefits, spousal death bequeaths, and decision-making ability for an unable spouse. Worse yet, is the likely direction of any elimination of marriage requirements. Look for multiple-person marriages (polyamory, e.g., three women and two men; polygynous (one husband, multiple wives); polyandrous (one wife, multiple husbands), marriages to a close relative, adult-child marriages, marriage to your pet (dog/cat/iguana/snake/etc…), or whatever the mind can imagine.

Face Of The Moon

Marriage between one woman and one man has been around for thousands of years. Why has the definition of marriage changed within the last ten?

It was good to have Neil Armstrong and ‘Buzz’ Aldrin land the Eagle on the moon. Both could do extra-ordinary things. They were not better people, but had the ability for space-faring. But, they couldn’t have any babies together…

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–----------------------------------------------------

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net .

Same-sex unions are “not an expansion but a dismantling of the institution.”     Matthew J. Frank /  FIRST THINGS

Opposition has released huge amounts of false information on the Amendment just prior to the vote. Statements about ‘Further discrimination against homosexuals’, and ‘voting for the Amendment will eliminate rights for homosexuals’ were rampant prior to the election. As a result some thought the Amendment had to be defeated to fight discrimination.

Billy Graham, Catholics and other organizations who have supported Amendment 1, let NC know their vote was for no change in existing state law. NC already states marriage is to be between a man and a woman, and this Amendment makes it almost impossible for activist judges to alter NC’s existing law disallowing gay marriage.

Rep. Paul Stam (Majority Leader/NC House) repeats no benefits from federal government can occur based on a domestic legal union, other than marriage. The state government has never offered benefits for the unmarried, but nine (.14%) of the 625  local governments have.

The tone of the Amendment vote was set early when the local TV station (WLOS) reported the slicing and stealing of signs advocating voting or nor voting for the Amendment. Others have reported multiple cases of sign stealing from private property. WLOS said this was the largest amount of vandalism ever in a NC primary. 

Over 500,000 people have voted early in this primary. This is 4% larger than the huge turnout in the 2008 presidential primary between Obama and Clinton. As a likely ‘swing’ state in the presidential election, a vote ‘against’ the Amendment would have probably have given Obama the energy he needed for obtaining NC’s electoral votes, thus pushing the national election towards Obama.

Marriage is a privilege to those who fit the necessary standards. Ability to produce offspring is usually one of those standards. A lifelong marriage commitment is also required.

“Married” is a status which allows heterosexual couples to receive some benefits from the federal and state governments. Marriage of a woman and a man has always been “rooted in the Nation’s history and tradition (Moore v. East Cleveland (1977)”. The Amendment, therefore, precludes expanding ‘due process rights’  to include same-sex marriage.

In federal law, marriage means "a legal union between only one man and one woman…” (1 U.S.C. §7, 1996). This definition is consistent with the long-standing definition of marriage in Black’s Law Dictionary (5th Ed., 1979). 

The Defense of Marriage Act [DoMA/ US Congress/1996]--for the first time under federal law defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. While DoMA prevents same-sex couples from receiving federal benefits, it doesn’t order which state benefits are given to married couples, how individual states define marriage, or what laws are made concerning other aspects of married couples. It also doesn’t confine any benefits already paid to unmarried people.

Marriage Amendment 1 does not adversely affect NC’s economy. A 2011 report by The American Legislative Exchange Council (2011) ranked states by economic performance and outlook. Eighty percent of the top 10 states have marriage amendments. None has legalized same-sex marriage, civil unions or domestic partnerships. Ninety percent with the poorest economic growth, have legalized same-sex marriages. 

If same-sex marriage is called a ‘right’, then it will be extremely difficult to eliminate other types of ‘marriage’ clearly detrimental to a family (e.g., polygamy, pedophilia marriages, or bestiality). Nothing in the Constitution requires same-sex unions be called “marriage.”

Equal protection is easily secured without granting a “right to marry”. In these cases same-sex couples may legally be recognized as partners with particular rights, but are not considered married. Unfortunately, unmarried couples are attempting to acquire the same benefits as married heterosexual couples, within the last 20 years.

Benefits heterosexual married couples receive include income tax deductions, filing joint taxes, receiving a spouse’s inheritance upon death, family hospital visitation rights, and the next-of-kin right to make medical decisions during an emergency.

The Amendment passed by a narrower margin because of misleading data provided by many TV and radio adds. Opposition to Amendment 1 kept calling it ‘a ban on gay marriage’. The Amendment only said what the exact wording was: “marriage is between one man and one woman”. All public announcements completely discouraged discrimination towards any homosexual.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.

The political decision on marriage made in North Carolina shortly will have aftershocks throughout the nation.

The political upheaval in North Carolina will crest on May 8th. That date is for the Republican primary, and on that date NC will decide if marriage is only between one woman and one man. A relationship envisioned when marriage was originally ordained.

North Carolina will be in the spotlight shortly, and many believe the way NC votes will determine the direction of the country on marriage. Six states have legalized gay marriage, and two more have authorized them, but have not yet issued licenses.

Many privileges exist for all who meet special requirements: voters, airline pilots, professional sports figures, police, firemen, Navy SEALs, etc., etc…  There always have been special requirements for certain occupations. In marriage, the requirement has always been one woman, one man. But things began to change about 20 years ago.

So many want to change those requirements for marriage. At least differently than stated by the dictionary Thorndike –Barnhart [